Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-18659-broken-gates-re-evaluating-web-bot-defenses-in-the-age-of-llm-agents.md
T
2026-07-27 16:28:23 +08:00

63 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Broken Gates: Re-evaluating Web Bot Defenses in the Age of LLM Agents
---
type: paper
title: "Broken Gates: Re-evaluating Web Bot Defenses in the Age of LLM Agents"
authors: Behzad Ousat, Nikita Turkmen, Lalchandra Rampersaud, Dillan Bailey, Amin Kharraz
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18659
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-27
published_at: 2026-07-20
updated_at: 2026-07-20
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- agent-safety
- computer-use
- tool-use
- workflow-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CR
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 17
collection_queries: llm-agent, web-gui-agent
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: llm-agent, web-gui-agent
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, computer-use, tool-use, workflow-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.CR
- collection score: 17
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18659