Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-17437-empirical-grounding-improves-the-realism-of-llm-agents-simulating-human-behavior.md
T
2026-07-27 16:28:23 +08:00

64 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Empirical Grounding Improves the Realism of LLM Agents Simulating Human Behavior During Disruptions
---
type: paper
title: Empirical Grounding Improves the Realism of LLM Agents Simulating Human Behavior During Disruptions
authors: Chen Xia, Zexi Kuang, Yuqing Hu
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17437
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-27
published_at: 2026-07-19
updated_at: 2026-07-19
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- memory
- planning
- rag
- reasoning
- world-model
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.AI
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 19
collection_queries: llm-agent, planning-agent
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: llm-agent, planning-agent
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, memory, planning, rag, reasoning, world-model
- arXiv categories: cs.AI
- collection score: 19
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17437