Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-26614-hilsva-design-and-evaluation-of-a-human-in-the-loop-agentic-system-for-scientifi.md
T
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

68 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific Visualization
---
type: paper
title: "HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific Visualization"
authors: Kuangshi Ai, Patrick Phuoc Do, Chaoli Wang
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26614
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-25
updated_at: 2026-06-25
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- computer-use
- multi-agent
- planning
- rag
- reasoning
- tool-use
- workflow-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.HC
- cs.AI
- cs.GR
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 23
collection_queries: multi-agent-llm, planning-agent
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: multi-agent-llm, planning-agent
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, computer-use, multi-agent, planning, rag, reasoning, tool-use, workflow-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.GR
- collection score: 23
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26614