Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2605-17453-trust-no-tool-evaluating-and-defending-llm-agents-under-untrusted-tool-feedback.md
T
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

62 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Trust No Tool: Evaluating and Defending LLM Agents under Untrusted Tool Feedback
---
type: paper
title: "Trust No Tool: Evaluating and Defending LLM Agents under Untrusted Tool Feedback"
authors: Lecheng Yan, Ruizhe Li, Xicheng Han, Wenxi Li, Binwu Wang, Longyue Wang, Chenyang Lyu, Guanhua Chen
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17453
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-05-17
updated_at: 2026-05-17
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- agent-safety
- tool-use
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CR
- cs.CL
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 15
collection_queries: agent-safety
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-safety
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, tool-use
- arXiv categories: cs.CR, cs.CL
- collection score: 15
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17453