wuyang
62 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
62 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Paper: Toward Auditable AI Scientists: A Hypothesis Evolution Protocol for LLM Agents
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
type: paper
|
|
title: "Toward Auditable AI Scientists: A Hypothesis Evolution Protocol for LLM Agents"
|
|
authors: Izumi Takahara, Teruyasu Mizoguchi
|
|
year: 2026
|
|
venue: arXiv
|
|
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09195
|
|
code_url:
|
|
source: arxiv
|
|
collected_at: 2026-07-27
|
|
published_at: 2026-07-10
|
|
updated_at: 2026-07-10
|
|
status: queued
|
|
relevance: high
|
|
topics:
|
|
- agent-evaluation
|
|
- planning
|
|
- reasoning
|
|
- tool-use
|
|
methods:
|
|
-
|
|
benchmarks:
|
|
-
|
|
models:
|
|
-
|
|
datasets:
|
|
- cs.AI
|
|
related_concepts:
|
|
-
|
|
related_jobs:
|
|
-
|
|
related_experiments:
|
|
-
|
|
related_projects:
|
|
-
|
|
collection_score: 17
|
|
collection_queries: planning-agent, tool-use
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## One-line Takeaway
|
|
|
|
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
|
|
|
|
## Why Collected
|
|
|
|
- matched queries: planning-agent, tool-use
|
|
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, planning, reasoning, tool-use
|
|
- arXiv categories: cs.AI
|
|
- collection score: 17
|
|
|
|
## Review Checklist
|
|
|
|
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
|
|
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
|
|
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
|
|
|
|
## Links
|
|
|
|
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09195
|