56 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
56 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Collection Run: 2026-07-08 arXiv Expanded Sweep
|
|
|
|
status: completed
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
- source: arXiv API
|
|
- date window: 2025-07-08 to 2026-07-08
|
|
- query groups: 15
|
|
- unique candidates seen: 1506
|
|
- high-relevance candidates promoted to paper items: 970
|
|
- remaining reserve candidates: 536
|
|
- new paper files written in this run: 968
|
|
|
|
## Query Groups
|
|
|
|
- llm-agent
|
|
- language-agent
|
|
- ai-agent
|
|
- agentic-ai
|
|
- agent-evaluation
|
|
- agent-memory
|
|
- tool-use
|
|
- function-calling
|
|
- coding-agent
|
|
- web-gui-agent
|
|
- multi-agent-llm
|
|
- agent-safety
|
|
- rag-agent
|
|
- planning-agent
|
|
- autonomous-agent-llm
|
|
|
|
## Outputs
|
|
|
|
- `data/arxiv-agent-candidates-2025-07-08-to-2026-07-08.json`
|
|
- `data/arxiv-agent-papers-2025-07-08-to-2026-07-08.json`
|
|
- `papers/corpus-summary-2026-07-08.md`
|
|
- 968 generated `papers/items/*.md` files
|
|
|
|
## Method Notes
|
|
|
|
- The candidate manifest stores title, arXiv URL, authors, categories, dates, matched query groups, auto topics, score, and relevance.
|
|
- It intentionally does not store abstracts, to avoid turning the repo into a raw abstract mirror.
|
|
- Generated paper items are `queued`; they are collection records, not reviewed summaries.
|
|
- Auto tags are recall-oriented and need later cleanup.
|
|
- The first API pass selected the top 400; after inspecting score distribution, all 970 `relevance=high` candidates were promoted locally from the candidate manifest.
|
|
- arXiv returned 429 during a later refresh attempt, so the collector now includes retry/backoff controls and the promotion step can run offline.
|
|
|
|
## First Trend Takeaways
|
|
|
|
- Evaluation and benchmarking dominate the corpus.
|
|
- Memory is now a central systems topic, including governance, poisoning, provenance, and procedural memory.
|
|
- Agent safety has moved toward runtime risks: tool leakage, prompt injection, data injection, memory poisoning, and action-boundary violations.
|
|
- Coding-agent evaluation is moving beyond single-issue SWE-Bench tasks.
|
|
- GUI/computer-use agents and workflow/enterprise agents are now large enough to deserve separate tracks.
|