Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-03657-diagnosing-knowledge-gaps-in-llm-tool-use-an-agentic-benchmark-for-novel-api-acq.md
T
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

62 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Diagnosing Knowledge Gaps in LLM Tool Use: An Agentic Benchmark for Novel API Acquisition
---
type: paper
title: "Diagnosing Knowledge Gaps in LLM Tool Use: An Agentic Benchmark for Novel API Acquisition"
authors: Jinnuo Liu, Yue Peng, Jinhan Niu, Hongyi Wen
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03657
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-02
updated_at: 2026-06-02
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- coding-agent
- rag
- tool-use
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.AI
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 20
collection_queries: agent-evaluation
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-evaluation
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, coding-agent, rag, tool-use
- arXiv categories: cs.AI
- collection score: 20
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03657