Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2602-21127-are-you-sure-an-empirical-study-of-human-perception-vulnerability-in-llm-driven-.md
T
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

64 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: "Are You Sure?": An Empirical Study of Human Perception Vulnerability in LLM-Driven Agentic Systems
---
type: paper
title: "\"Are You Sure?\": An Empirical Study of Human Perception Vulnerability in LLM-Driven Agentic Systems"
authors: Xinfeng Li, Shenyu Dai, Kelong Zheng, Yue Xiao, Gelei Deng, Wei Dong, Xiaofeng Wang
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21127
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-02-24
updated_at: 2026-02-24
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-safety
- tool-use
- workflow-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.HC
- cs.AI
- cs.CR
- cs.SI
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 13
collection_queries: agent-safety
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-safety
- inferred topics: agent-safety, tool-use, workflow-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CR, cs.SI
- collection score: 13
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21127