Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-20121-openskillrisk-benchmarking-agent-safety-when-using-real-world-risky-third-party-.md
2026-07-27 16:28:23 +08:00

63 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: OpenSkillRisk: Benchmarking Agent Safety When Using Real-World Risky Third-Party Skills
---
type: paper
title: "OpenSkillRisk: Benchmarking Agent Safety When Using Real-World Risky Third-Party Skills"
authors: Qiyuan Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Kun Zhan, Kaike Zhang, Ning Miao
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20121
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-27
published_at: 2026-07-23
updated_at: 2026-07-23
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- agent-safety
- rag
- reasoning
- tool-use
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CL
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 19
collection_queries: agent-safety
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-safety
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, rag, reasoning, tool-use
- arXiv categories: cs.CL
- collection score: 19
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20121