Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-14989-omniabench-benchmarking-general-ai-agents-across-diverse-scenarios.md
2026-07-27 16:28:23 +08:00

62 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios
---
type: paper
title: "OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios"
authors: Chengyu Shen, Yujie Fu, Gangtao Xin, Yanheng Hou, Wenlong Fei, Guojie Zhu, Jiawei Li, Hongcheng Gao, et al.
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14989
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-27
published_at: 2026-07-16
updated_at: 2026-07-16
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- planning
- rag
- tool-use
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CL
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 19
collection_queries: agent-evaluation, ai-agent
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-evaluation, ai-agent
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, planning, rag, tool-use
- arXiv categories: cs.CL
- collection score: 19
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14989