Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-28456-is-lying-an-emergent-behaviour-in-llms-evidence-from-gaslighting-ai-agents-in-a-.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

62 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Is Lying an Emergent Behaviour in LLMs? Evidence from Gaslighting AI agents in a Sustainability Game
---
type: paper
title: Is Lying an Emergent Behaviour in LLMs? Evidence from Gaslighting AI agents in a Sustainability Game
authors: Subhendu Bhandary, Federico Carucci, Christos Charalambous, Francesca Dilisante, Ksenia Dvorkina, Anna Garbo, Jiaqi Liang, Riccardo Vasellini, et al.
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28456
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-26
updated_at: 2026-06-26
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-safety
- memory
- multi-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.MA
- cs.AI
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 18
collection_queries: ai-agent, llm-agent, multi-agent-llm
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: ai-agent, llm-agent, multi-agent-llm
- inferred topics: agent-safety, memory, multi-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.MA, cs.AI
- collection score: 18
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28456