Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-21123-a-multi-agent-audit-framework-for-high-stakes-reasoning-evaluation-and-interpret.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

63 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: A Multi-Agent Audit Framework for High-Stakes Reasoning: Evaluation and Interpretability in Clinical Mental Health Screening
---
type: paper
title: "A Multi-Agent Audit Framework for High-Stakes Reasoning: Evaluation and Interpretability in Clinical Mental Health Screening"
authors: Jingchen Ye, Yanpei Yu, Luyao Zhang
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21123
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-19
updated_at: 2026-06-19
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- multi-agent
- rag
- reasoning
- workflow-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CL
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 18
collection_queries: rag-agent
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: rag-agent
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, multi-agent, rag, reasoning, workflow-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.CL
- collection score: 18
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21123