Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-08172-the-governance-of-human-llm-interaction-safety-gating-civility-steering-and-affe.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

66 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: The Governance of Human-LLM Interaction: Safety Gating, Civility Steering, and Affective Default Lock-In
---
type: paper
title: "The Governance of Human-LLM Interaction: Safety Gating, Civility Steering, and Affective Default Lock-In"
authors: Manuele Reani, Hongjian Zhang, Hongyu Tian
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08172
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-06
updated_at: 2026-06-06
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- agent-safety
- computer-use
- multi-agent
- planning
- tool-use
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.HC
- cs.AI
- cs.CY
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 13
collection_queries: agent-evaluation
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-evaluation
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, computer-use, multi-agent, planning, tool-use
- arXiv categories: cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CY
- collection score: 13
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08172