agent/papers/items/2026-2606-08172-the-governance-of-human-llm-interaction-safety-gating-civility-steering-and-affe.md

Paper: The Governance of Human-LLM Interaction: Safety Gating, Civility Steering, and Affective Default Lock-In

---

type: paper title: "The Governance of Human-LLM Interaction: Safety Gating, Civility Steering, and Affective Default Lock-In" authors: Manuele Reani, Hongjian Zhang, Hongyu Tian year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08172 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-08 published_at: 2026-06-06 updated_at: 2026-06-06 status: queued relevance: high topics:

• agent-evaluation
• agent-safety
• computer-use
• multi-agent
• planning
• tool-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

• cs.HC
• cs.AI
• cs.CY related_concepts:

related_jobs:

related_experiments:

related_projects:

collection_score: 13 collection_queries: agent-evaluation

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

• matched queries: agent-evaluation
• inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, computer-use, multi-agent, planning, tool-use
• arXiv categories: cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CY
• collection score: 13

Review Checklist

• Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
• Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
• Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?

Links

• arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08172