Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-07379-do-coding-agents-deceive-us-detecting-and-preventing-cheating-via-capped-evaluat.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

64 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: Do Coding Agents Deceive Us? Detecting and Preventing Cheating via Capped Evaluation with Randomized Tests
---
type: paper
title: Do Coding Agents Deceive Us? Detecting and Preventing Cheating via Capped Evaluation with Randomized Tests
authors: Thanawat Lodkaew, Johannes Ackermann, Soichiro Nishimori, Nontawat Charoenphakdee, Masashi Sugiyama, Takashi Ishida
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07379
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-05
updated_at: 2026-06-08
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- coding-agent
- rag
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.LG
- cs.AI
- cs.CL
- stat.ME
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 14
collection_queries: agent-evaluation
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-evaluation
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, coding-agent, rag
- arXiv categories: cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL, stat.ME
- collection score: 14
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07379