Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2606-02965-what-benchmarks-don-t-measure-the-case-for-evaluating-abstention-competence-in-a.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

63 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: What Benchmarks Don't Measure: The Case for Evaluating Abstention Competence in Autonomous Agents
---
type: paper
title: "What Benchmarks Don't Measure: The Case for Evaluating Abstention Competence in Autonomous Agents"
authors: Victor Ojewale, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02965
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-06-01
updated_at: 2026-06-01
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- agent-safety
- computer-use
- tool-use
- workflow-agent
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.AI
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 14
collection_queries: agent-evaluation
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-evaluation
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, computer-use, tool-use, workflow-agent
- arXiv categories: cs.AI
- collection score: 14
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02965