Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2605-23067-what-training-data-teaches-rl-memory-agents-an-empirical-study-of-curriculum-eff.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

61 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Paper: What Training Data Teaches RL Memory Agents: An Empirical Study of Curriculum Effects in Memory-Augmented QA
---
type: paper
title: "What Training Data Teaches RL Memory Agents: An Empirical Study of Curriculum Effects in Memory-Augmented QA"
authors: Xinjie He, Zhiyuan Lin, Su Liu, Jialun Wu, Qiyang Xie, Weikai Zhou, Shuai Xiao
year: 2026
venue: arXiv
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23067
code_url:
source: arxiv
collected_at: 2026-07-08
published_at: 2026-05-21
updated_at: 2026-05-21
status: queued
relevance: high
topics:
- agent-evaluation
- memory
- reasoning
methods:
-
benchmarks:
-
models:
-
datasets:
- cs.CL
related_concepts:
-
related_jobs:
-
related_experiments:
-
related_projects:
-
collection_score: 16
collection_queries: agent-memory
---
## One-line Takeaway
Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.
## Why Collected
- matched queries: agent-memory
- inferred topics: agent-evaluation, memory, reasoning
- arXiv categories: cs.CL
- collection score: 16
## Review Checklist
- Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
- Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
- Should it be promoted from `queued` to `skimmed` or `summarized`?
## Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23067