Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-09996-who-when-pro-can-llms-really-attribute-failures-in-ai-agents.md
T
2026-07-27 16:28:23 +08:00

1.3 KiB

Paper: Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?


type: paper title: "Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?" authors: Jiale Liu, Huajun Xi, Shaokun Zhang, Yifan Zeng, Tianwei Yue, Chi Wang, Jian Kang, Qingyun Wu, et al. year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09996 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-27 published_at: 2026-07-10 updated_at: 2026-07-10 status: queued relevance: high topics:

  • agent-evaluation
  • computer-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

  • cs.AI related_concepts:

collection_score: 14 collection_queries: ai-agent

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

  • matched queries: ai-agent
  • inferred topics: agent-evaluation, computer-use
  • arXiv categories: cs.AI
  • collection score: 14

Review Checklist

  • Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
  • Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
  • Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?