Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-01213-reporescue-an-empirical-study-of-llm-agents-on-whole-repository-compatibility-re.md
T
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

1.4 KiB

Paper: RepoRescue: An Empirical Study of LLM Agents on Whole-Repository Compatibility Rescue


type: paper title: "RepoRescue: An Empirical Study of LLM Agents on Whole-Repository Compatibility Rescue" authors: Zhihao Lin, Mingyi Zhou, Zhensu Sun, Yizhuo Yang, Renyu Yang, David Lo, Li Li year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01213 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-08 published_at: 2026-07-01 updated_at: 2026-07-01 status: queued relevance: high topics:

  • agent-evaluation
  • coding-agent
  • reasoning
  • tool-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

  • cs.SE related_concepts:

collection_score: 15 collection_queries: llm-agent

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

  • matched queries: llm-agent
  • inferred topics: agent-evaluation, coding-agent, reasoning, tool-use
  • arXiv categories: cs.SE
  • collection score: 15

Review Checklist

  • Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
  • Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
  • Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?