agent/papers/items/2026-2607-22368-do-agent-benchmarks-measure-capability-protocol-validity-in-the-age-of-agentic-a.md

Paper: Do Agent Benchmarks Measure Capability? Protocol Validity in the Age of Agentic AI

---

type: paper title: Do Agent Benchmarks Measure Capability? Protocol Validity in the Age of Agentic AI authors: Jiaqi Shao, Hanck Chen, Wei Zhang, Maxm Pan, Bing Luo year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22368 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-27 published_at: 2026-07-24 updated_at: 2026-07-24 status: queued relevance: high topics:

• agent-evaluation
• coding-agent
• planning
• tool-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

• cs.AI related_concepts:

related_jobs:

related_experiments:

related_projects:

collection_score: 18 collection_queries: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

• matched queries: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai
• inferred topics: agent-evaluation, coding-agent, planning, tool-use
• arXiv categories: cs.AI
• collection score: 18

Review Checklist

• Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
• Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
• Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?

Links

• arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22368