Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2607-02294-coding-agents-are-guessing-measuring-action-boundary-violations-in-underspecifie.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

1.5 KiB

Paper: Coding Agents Are Guessing: Measuring Action-Boundary Violations in Underspecified DevOps Instructions


type: paper title: "Coding Agents Are Guessing: Measuring Action-Boundary Violations in Underspecified DevOps Instructions" authors: Zimo Ji, Zekai Zhang, Congying Xu, Zongjie Li, Yudong Gao, Shuai Wang, Shing-Chi Cheung year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02294 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-08 published_at: 2026-07-02 updated_at: 2026-07-02 status: queued relevance: high topics:

  • agent-evaluation
  • agent-safety
  • coding-agent
  • tool-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

  • cs.SE related_concepts:

collection_score: 17 collection_queries: agent-evaluation, coding-agent

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

  • matched queries: agent-evaluation, coding-agent
  • inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, coding-agent, tool-use
  • arXiv categories: cs.SE
  • collection score: 17

Review Checklist

  • Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
  • Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
  • Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?