Files
agent/papers/items/2026-2605-24069-when-the-manual-lies-a-realistic-benchmark-to-evaluate-mcp-poisoning-attacks-for.md
2026-07-08 12:25:30 +08:00

1.4 KiB

Paper: When the Manual Lies: A Realistic Benchmark to Evaluate MCP Poisoning Attacks for LLM Agents


type: paper title: "When the Manual Lies: A Realistic Benchmark to Evaluate MCP Poisoning Attacks for LLM Agents" authors: Shi Liu, Xuehai Tang, Xikang Yang, Liang Lin, Biyu Zhou, Wenjie Xiao, Wantao Liu year: 2026 venue: arXiv url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24069 code_url: source: arxiv collected_at: 2026-07-08 published_at: 2026-05-22 updated_at: 2026-05-22 status: queued relevance: high topics:

  • agent-evaluation
  • agent-safety
  • planning
  • tool-use methods:

benchmarks:

models:

datasets:

  • cs.CR
  • cs.AI related_concepts:

collection_score: 19 collection_queries: planning-agent

One-line Takeaway

Auto-collected from arXiv because it matched the Agent collection queries. Needs human skim.

Why Collected

  • matched queries: planning-agent
  • inferred topics: agent-evaluation, agent-safety, planning, tool-use
  • arXiv categories: cs.CR, cs.AI
  • collection score: 19

Review Checklist

  • Does this paper directly inform Agent architecture, evaluation, memory, tools, safety, coding agents, GUI/browser agents, or multi-agent workflows?
  • Does it include a benchmark, dataset, code, or reproducible experimental setup?
  • Should it be promoted from queued to skimmed or summarized?