Record completion research site deployment

docs/08-next-work.md

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 # Next Work
 
-last_reviewed: 2026-07-27
+last_reviewed: 2026-07-28
 
 ## P0: Challenge the Completion Research
 
-The immediate work is not an Agent experiment and not a new evaluation page. Review
-`research/completion-verification/findings.md` with the user and determine whether its problem
-decomposition is actually useful.
+The immediate work is not an Agent experiment or a product redesign. Review the document at
+`https://agent-eval.k1412.top/` with the user and determine whether the problem decomposition is
+actually useful. The Markdown sources remain
+`research/completion-verification/findings.md` and `evidence-ledger.md`.
 
 The review should test whether the research can answer, without falling back to paper titles:
 
@@ -24,6 +25,10 @@ does not prove.
 Only after this review should the candidate completion certificate, failure object, and recovery router
 be translated into task contracts. They are currently system inferences, not validated implementations.
 
+The old v1 evaluation explanation remains available at
+`https://agent-eval.k1412.top/evaluation-v1.html`. Use it only to compare the premature contract-first
+route with the current evidence-first research, not as a benchmark result.
+
 ## P1: Prove the Paper Compiler
 
 The main project goal is now a high-efficiency knowledge funnel, not a paper browser and not a fixed
@@ -222,7 +227,7 @@ Still missing:
 
 For the knowledge-base repository:
 
-1. read `research/completion-verification/findings.md` with the user;
+1. read `https://agent-eval.k1412.top/` with the user;
 2. collect objections, ambiguous terms and missing counterexamples;
 3. tighten or reject conclusions against the evidence ledger;
 4. only then convert the accepted model into a minimal task-contract schema;