Record completion research site deployment

docs/07-exploration-history.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Exploration History
 
-last_reviewed: 2026-07-27
+last_reviewed: 2026-07-28
 
 This is the decision history, including failed routes. Preserve it so future work does not rediscover the same lessons.
 
@@ -298,3 +298,30 @@ Current source of truth:
 - `research/completion-verification/findings.md`
 - `research/completion-verification/evidence-ledger.md`
 - `experiments/knowledge-compilation/2026-07-27-agent-completion-research-audit.md`
+
+## 14. Research Document, Not a New Product Shape
+
+The user asked to read the completion research as a web page because the Markdown artifacts were
+harder to traverse. This did not reopen the larger website/product-design question. The implementation
+therefore treats the page as a document rendering of committed research:
+
+- the first view states the conclusion and evidence boundary;
+- eight conclusions lead into capability decomposition and two distinct chains for closure and recovery;
+- each argument exposes its direct numbers and non-extrapolation boundary progressively;
+- the 2023-2026 timeline separates measurement progress from unsolved general capability;
+- the completion certificate, failure object, and recovery router remain labeled as system inference;
+- all 40 source papers are searchable, with 37 audited and 3 context-only records;
+- evidence data is generated from the Markdown ledger and checked by source hash.
+
+The former v1 evaluation explanation page remains at `/evaluation-v1.html`. It was not deleted or
+silently rewritten.
+
+Desktop 1440×1000 and mobile 390×844 Chrome checks found no horizontal overflow or console/page
+errors. Core filtering returned 26 records; recovery filtering returned 12; public evidence search and
+expansion worked. The production image
+`docker.k1412.top/wuyang/agent-eval:20260727T165727Z-4c88faa` was deployed on the existing NAS port
+12005 and existing HTTPS route.
+
+Decision retained: use `https://agent-eval.k1412.top/` to challenge the research with the user.
+Do not interpret successful document presentation as validation of the proposed evaluation system or
+as permission to resume runner implementation.