Audit Agent completion and recovery research

2026-07-28 00:06:57 +08:00
parent 5373d564ec
commit 3b55bfaad2
12 changed files with 840 additions and 21 deletions
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ This is not merely a paper browser. The user wants a scaffold that turns a large

 The current Atlas is a corpus exploration prototype, not a validated solution to this goal. The user rated its practical learning value at effectively zero because browsing left no durable learning state. Do not spend the next iteration polishing the graph without addressing this gap.

+The current immediate research question is Agent completion, verification, and recovery. Read
+`research/completion-verification/findings.md` and `evidence-ledger.md` before extending the Agent
+evaluation work. Experiments and web redesign are intentionally paused until the user challenges and
+accepts or revises those conclusions.
+
 ## Truth Hierarchy

 Treat repository artifacts according to their evidence level:
@@ -56,6 +61,9 @@ The Agent evaluation design under `research/evaluation/` is an implementation co
 benchmark. Its task contracts explicitly mark which runners do not exist yet.
 `evaluation-site/` is a presentation layer for that contract. It must not introduce stronger claims than
 the research artifact or display simulation values as real benchmark results.
+The completion-certificate, failure-object, and recovery-router design in
+`research/completion-verification/findings.md` is a cross-paper inference, not a validated implementation.
+The existing evaluation contract must be revised against that research before runner work resumes.

 ## Repository Contracts